🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as among the deadliest – and significant – occasions during three decades of unrest in this area.

Throughout the area where it happened – the memories of the tragic events are displayed on the buildings and etched in people's minds.

A civil rights march was conducted on a wintry, sunny period in the city.

The protest was opposing the system of imprisonment without charges – detaining individuals without legal proceedings – which had been put in place in response to three years of unrest.

Soldiers from the specialized division killed thirteen individuals in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly republican area.

One image became especially prominent.

Photographs showed a religious figure, Father Daly, displaying a stained with blood cloth while attempting to protect a crowd moving a youth, Jackie Duddy, who had been fatally wounded.

News camera operators documented much footage on the day.

The archive features Fr Daly informing a journalist that military personnel "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "completely sure" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

The narrative of what happened was disputed by the initial investigation.

The Widgery Tribunal determined the soldiers had been attacked first.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the ruling party commissioned another inquiry, following pressure by family members, who said the initial inquiry had been a cover-up.

That year, the findings by the investigation said that overall, the paratroopers had discharged weapons initially and that none of the individuals had posed any threat.

The then head of state, the leader, expressed regret in the government chamber – saying killings were "without justification and unacceptable."

Law enforcement started to examine the matter.

One former paratrooper, identified as the accused, was brought to trial for homicide.

Indictments were filed regarding the killings of the first individual, 22, and twenty-six-year-old the second individual.

Soldier F was additionally charged of attempting to murder several people, additional persons, more people, an additional individual, and an unidentified individual.

Remains a court ruling maintaining the veteran's privacy, which his lawyers have claimed is necessary because he is at threat.

He testified the investigation that he had only fired at individuals who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was rejected in the concluding document.

Evidence from the investigation was unable to be used directly as proof in the criminal process.

During the trial, the veteran was shielded from sight with a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in the hearing at a session in that month, to reply "innocent" when the charges were presented.

Relatives of those who were killed on the incident made the trip from the city to the judicial building daily of the trial.

One relative, whose relative was died, said they always knew that attending the case would be emotional.

"I can see everything in my memory," the relative said, as we examined the primary sites mentioned in the proceedings – from the street, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the adjoining the courtyard, where one victim and another victim were died.

"It returns me to where I was that day.

"I participated in moving my brother and lay him in the medical transport.

"I went through the entire event during the testimony.

"Despite having to go through all that – it's still meaningful for me."